Stonedreamer at 04:38, 21 April 2025

2025-04-21T04:38:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:38, 21 April 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== A Personal Note ==		== A Personal Note ==
	I love AI, and think it is a really powerful tool. Shadowrun, in fact, was a deep inspiration for me in pursuing a career in emerging technologies. Generatie AI technologies like Stable Diffusion are awesome and can create some really amazing imagery, but the proverbial well it draws its creations from seems like its been tainted<ref>[https://copyrightalliance.org/andersen-v-stability-ai-copyright-case/ ''Top Takeaways from Order in the Andersen v. Stability AI Copyright Case'', Kevin Madigan, the Copyright Alliance, Retrieved 4/21/2025]</ref>. Similarly, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have been targeted with similar concerns about its training database, and whether its output violates derivative work as defined in US copyright law<ref>[https://www.bloomberglaw.com/external/document/XDDQ1PNK000000/copyrights-professional-perspective-copyright-chaos-legal-implic ''Copyrights, Professional Perspective - Copyright Chaos: Legal Implications of Generative AI'', Bloomberg Law, Retrieved 4/21/2025]</ref>.		I love AI, and think it is a really powerful tool. [[Shadowrun (IP)\|Shadowrun]], in fact, was a deep inspiration for me in pursuing a career in emerging technologies. Generatie AI technologies like Stable Diffusion are awesome and can create some really amazing imagery, but the proverbial well it draws its creations from seems like its been tainted<ref>[https://copyrightalliance.org/andersen-v-stability-ai-copyright-case/ ''Top Takeaways from Order in the Andersen v. Stability AI Copyright Case'', Kevin Madigan, the Copyright Alliance, Retrieved 4/21/2025]</ref>. Similarly, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have been targeted with similar concerns about its training database, and whether its output violates derivative work as defined in US copyright law<ref>[https://www.bloomberglaw.com/external/document/XDDQ1PNK000000/copyrights-professional-perspective-copyright-chaos-legal-implic ''Copyrights, Professional Perspective - Copyright Chaos: Legal Implications of Generative AI'', Bloomberg Law, Retrieved 4/21/2025]</ref>.

	Until there is further clarity on the legality of AI outputs and transparent/equitable use of material for training sets, the pages you'll find here are authored and posted by little old me.		Until there is further clarity on the legality of AI outputs and transparent/equitable use of material for training sets, the pages you'll find here are authored and posted by little old me.

	~Stonedreamer		~[[User:Stonedreamer\|Stonedreamer]]

	== References ==		== References ==
	<references />		<references />

Stonedreamer: Created page with "The Policy of SextantofWorlds.net on AI is that unfortunately, AI does has not yet met the standards of [https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/ fair use] in a clear enough statement from its creators to be used on this wiki. The current court suit we are tracking, ''Andersen vs. Stability AI'', has been filed against Stability AI, Midjourney, and Deviant Art. The case has been approved for discovery, and is set for trial in September, 2026[https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/a..."

2025-04-21T04:36:38Z

Created page with "The Policy of SextantofWorlds.net on AI is that unfortunately, AI does has not yet met the standards of [https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/ fair use] in a clear enough statement from its creators to be used on this wiki. The current court suit we are tracking, ''Andersen vs. Stability AI'', has been filed against Stability AI, Midjourney, and Deviant Art. The case has been approved for discovery, and is set for trial in September, 2026<ref>[https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/a..."

New page

The Policy of SextantofWorlds.net on AI is that unfortunately, AI does has not yet met the standards of [https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/ fair use] in a clear enough statement from its creators to be used on this wiki. The current court suit we are tracking, ''Andersen vs. Stability AI'', has been filed against Stability AI, Midjourney, and Deviant Art. The case has been approved for discovery, and is set for trial in September, 2026<ref>[https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/andersen-v-stability-ai-the-landmark-case-unpacking-the-copyright-risks-of-ai-image-generators/ ''Andersen v. Stability AI: The Landmark Case Unpacking the Copyright Risks of AI Image Generators'', NYU Journal of Intellectual Property]</ref>.

== A Personal Note ==
I love AI, and think it is a really powerful tool. Shadowrun, in fact, was a deep inspiration for me in pursuing a career in emerging technologies. Generatie AI technologies like Stable Diffusion are awesome and can create some really amazing imagery, but the proverbial well it draws its creations from seems like its been tainted<ref>[https://copyrightalliance.org/andersen-v-stability-ai-copyright-case/ ''Top Takeaways from Order in the Andersen v. Stability AI Copyright Case'', Kevin Madigan, the Copyright Alliance, Retrieved 4/21/2025]</ref>. Similarly, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have been targeted with similar concerns about its training database, and whether its output violates derivative work as defined in US copyright law<ref>[https://www.bloomberglaw.com/external/document/XDDQ1PNK000000/copyrights-professional-perspective-copyright-chaos-legal-implic ''Copyrights, Professional Perspective - Copyright Chaos: Legal Implications of Generative AI'', Bloomberg Law, Retrieved 4/21/2025]</ref>.

Until there is further clarity on the legality of AI outputs and transparent/equitable use of material for training sets, the pages you'll find here are authored and posted by little old me.

~Stonedreamer

== References ==
<references />

AI Policy - Revision history

Stonedreamer at 04:38, 21 April 2025